The most common examples of expository essays are: In general, expository essays can be characterized by lack of descriptive elements and simple structure.
They must be based on facts and require extensive research of the subject.
It might seem that the stories do have specific meanings, and the instructor has already decided what those meanings are. Instructors can be pretty dazzling (or mystifying) with their interpretations, but that’s because they have a lot of practice with stories and have developed a sense of the kinds of things to look for.
Even so, the most well-informed professor rarely arrives at conclusions that someone else wouldn’t disagree with.
First, literary analyses (or papers that offer an interpretation of a story) rely on the assumption that stories must mean something. Isn’t a story just an arrangement of characters and events?
And if the author wanted to convey a meaning, wouldn’t he or she be much better off writing an essay just telling us what he or she meant?
The core difference between narrative and expository essays is their style.
While narrative paper allows the author to be creative and tell a story in a way he or she likes, expository essays follow some strict rules that one must abide.
Perhaps your instructor has given you a list of topics to choose, or perhaps you have been asked to create your own.
Either way, you’ll need to generate ideas to use in the paper—even with an assigned topic, you’ll have to develop your own interpretation.