While the Patriot Act has helped prevent disastrous events in our nation, it is far too invasive and should be revised to maintain privacy and freedom.The Patriot Act was passed shortly after the catastrophic events of September 11, 2001 to combat terrorism in the United States of America.
While the Patriot Act has helped prevent disastrous events in our nation, it is far too invasive and should be revised to maintain privacy and freedom.The Patriot Act was passed shortly after the catastrophic events of September 11, 2001 to combat terrorism in the United States of America.Tags: Phd Thesis Decision MakingMaster Thesis Project Computer ScienceArgumentative Essay Criminal JusticeStages Of Research ProposalGroup Community Service ProjectsAnatomy Of A ThesisEssay On LibrariesEssay Contest For High School StudentsTypical History Essay QuestionsEssay Styles
Also, wiretapping no longer links to one device, so government agencies can now legally tap every single form of communication that a person of interest is using (Abramson and Godoy).
Perhaps the most shocking facet of the Patriot Act is that it permits indefinite detention, even if the offender is not a terrorist (How the Anti-Terrorism Bill Permits Indefinite Detention of Immigrants).
How is it that American citizens have supported, and even allowed the passing of, legislature that ignores the fourth amendment to the U. The Patriot Act has elevated the investigatory power of our nation’s government to a record high.
The Patriot Act, originally passed in October 2001, is one of the most controversial topics regarding American citizens’ privacy and security.
In the past, government agencies kept the information they acquired separate from other agencies, which hindered the pace at which terrorists and criminals were apprehended.
For instance, in 2003 a man named Lyman Faris was charged for planning the destruction of a New York City bridge.To elaborate, every time my mother (a five-foot tall, fifty-year-old Indian woman with a master’s degree in statistics and no criminal record) checks in for a flight she is subjected to extra security.This means that my mother’s credentials dub her to be a potential terrorist.The Patriot Act is clearly a controversial issue that affects a substantial amount of people, including non-Americans.The discourse of this paper focuses largely on four components of the Patriot Act.The first amendment states that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof” (Bill of Rights), but obstructing a passenger on an airplane based on their religious affiliation is clearly denouncing the practice of their religion.These procedures are quite shocking and greatly oppose how the United States government’s investigative powers were designed to function.This is a wild extrapolation because nothing about my mother aligns her with past terrorists, except maybe her religious affiliation.If this categorical information is what causes my mother to be identified as a possible threat, then the process of as data mining, as well as the Patriot Act, is unconstitutional and stands in opposition to the first amendment of the United States Constitution.This legislation has caused extreme dissent because it grants government agencies more investigatory power than ever before.Many of the sections within the Patriot Act have roused indignation among American citizens.