Apparently, the status update and newsfeed application permits individuals to follow up on what is happening to their friends regardless of the spatial distance between them (Facebook, 2011).
Following its huge membership base, most businesses are utilizing this platform to market their products and services to the myriad users (Carlson, 2010).
Given the magnitude of attention that Facebook has received across the world, my opinion that, it ought to be banned might sound like a big joke.
With the advent of Facebook and other social networking sites, the world is becoming smaller as people across different cultures, borders, genders and customs share and exchange materials online (Carlson, 2010).
According to Facebook (2011), the site is visited by over 800million active users with an average of 130 friends per user.
The author underscores that, Facebook photo applications have facilitated Facebook popularity whereby users can upload and share an unlimited number of photos.
Contrastingly, Facebook has also overgrown its initial social networking idea to encompass other diverse roles.
However, following some technical and operational advancement the site was expanded to other colleges in the region and it was just a matter of time before it was made available to everyone.
By 2006, nothing could stop Facebook from becoming a global phenomenon, when it started accepting membership to all and sundry as long as one was over 13 years and had a valid email address.
The above analysis indicates that Facebook is a social engineering site that defies the constraints of border, language , cultural, social ties and economic disparities and that it promotes interconnectedness among global users.
On the other hand, whereas social interconnectedness may sound like an excellent idea, the fact remains that, the shortcomings which will be discussed herein, outweighs the benefits of social connection.