But, always beware, as a beginning scholar, of criticizing any text as "confusing" or "crazy," or for "using too many hard words," since readers might simply conclude that you are too ignorant or slow to understand and appreciate it!This article was co-authored by our trained team of editors and researchers who validated it for accuracy and comprehensiveness.
" DO NOT use the standard high school-level approach of just writing: "I liked this book (or article or document or movie) because it is so cool and the ending made me feel happy," or "I hated it because it was stupid, and had nothing at all to do with my life, and was too negative and boring." In writing a response you may assume the reader has already read the text.
Thus, , and with your life (past, present or future)?
What has changed is the awareness these theorists now have of the ways in which environment, history, politics, and even sexual orientation, can affect a reader's response to a text.
This expansion of criteria has led many contemporary critics to refer to this type of critical theory as reader-oriented criticism rather than reader-response criticism.
There is no right or wrong answer to a reader response.
Nonetheless, it is important that you demonstrate an understanding of the reading and clearly explain and support your reactions."A reader response asks the reader [you] to examine, explain and defend her/his personal reaction to a reading.You will be asked to explore why you like or dislike the reading, explain whether you agree or disagree with the author, identify the reading's purpose, and critique the text.This means you should start your writing project in advance of the due date, in order to allow yourself enough time to revise your work. ...[Y]ou should state your general argument (your thesis) in an introductory paragraph and then use the rest of the essay to support your position, making sure that you deal carefully with each of the issues the questions raise somewhere in the paper. When quoting or citing from the documents or your textbook, simply put author and page numbers in parenthesis. Also, if you use more than three words in a row from any source, including the document youre writing about, those words must be enclosed in quotation marks.Ask someone else to read your draft(s) and write their comments and suggestions on how you might improve the work directly on your drafts. 3.) Please just staple your papers in the upper left hand corner.This is a departure from their earlier-held position, which emphasized the primacy of the relationship between reader and text, regardless of environment.Fish, in particular, laid out his theories regarding interpretive strategies, which, he stated, are shared by “interpretive communities” in several essays during the 1980s and later.Unlike the latter, which stressed the primacy of the text and an objective interpretation of it based on established criteria, advocates of reader-response criticism focused on the importance of the reader and their individual, subjective response to the text.One of the earliest proponents of this theory was Louise Rosenblatt, who stated in her Literature as Exploration (1938) that “a poem is what the reader lives through under the guidance of the text and experiences as relevant to the text.” The significance Rosenblatt and other reader-response critics placed on the reader was in direct opposition to the position taken by formalist critics in the past—for them, the text was the primary focus, and its impact on the reader or the idea that the reader's response was in any way relevant in the interpretation of the work was inconceivable.You can also use appropriate background information from the textbook and lectures, but you should use most of your space to discuss the documents. You need to revise your paper multiple times to be a successful writer. As a beginning scholar, if you write that something has nothing to do with you or does not pass your "Who cares?" test, but many other people think that it is important and great, readers will probably not agree with you that the text is dull or boring, but they may conclude instead that you are dull and boring, that you are too immature or uneducated to understand what important things the author wrote.