Tags: Pride And Prejudice Essay On MarriageThesis On Human Resources ManagementThesis Statements For The French RevolutionTravel And Tourism DissertationThesis Report On Convention CenterThing They Carried EssaySolving Trigonometric ProblemsEssay Writers In BangaloreSight Word Homework
The inference to be to be drawn from this early distinction between doing and understanding is obvious: as a spectator you may understand the ‘truth’ of what the spectacle is about; but the price you have to pay is withdrawal from participating in it.(and Walden Pond Books in Oakland, the ultimate store for book-wandering, where I found this and many other books I mentioned here), Redwood Regional Park, conversations with my mom, dad, and my boyfriend Joe, The act of observation inserts a separation between the self and nature, protecting nature.By Jeanie Lerche Davis Driving fast, breaking curfew, arguing, shoplifting.
In her study of the two composers, Tracy Mc Mullen argues that Oliveros’ practices differed from Cage’s because they included a “focus on embodiment, improvisation, and the dismantling of the mind/body dualism troubles the primacy of the individual and the universal over the contingent,” whereas Cage’s music did not include improvisation and sought to keep the self (his self) intact.
Oliveros’ group performances of Improvisation privileges listening and responding and therefore highlights intersubjectivity — the ways our actions and sense of self are constantly constructed through interaction with our environment.⁴ To add to these perils, art and anything involving ambiguity, poetics, and slow answers is severely threatened in such an environment.
During the teenage years, the area of the brain called the prefrontal cortex is developing.
This is the part of your brain that is behind your forehead.
The writer, the thinker, the dreamer, the poet, the metaphysician, the observer …
he who tries to solve a riddle or to pass judgement will become an anachronistic figure, destined to disappear from the face of the earth like the ichthyosaur and the mammoth.
In the most basic sense, that’s because I largely wrote this talk in the rose garden.
But it’s also because as I wrote it, I realized that the garden encompassed everything that I’m going to talk to you about, which is the practice of doing nothing, but also the architecture of nothing, the importance of public space, and an ethics of care and maintenance. What was I doing in the rose garden in the first place?
(When you enter an environment where there are birds, insects or animals, they are listening to you completely. Your presence may be the difference between life and death for the creatures of the environment. ⁶ Abram proposes that observing and communicating with animals temporarily invites us into their perspective – a “bird’s eye view” on my own environment being what I describe here.
For me this brings to mind something Hannah Arendt wrote in , even though I suspect the two would have disagreed on many points (Abram disdains, while Arendt admires, an intellectual remove from things) — that contemplating something requires seeing it from the outside: …the word ‘theoretical’ until a few hundred years ago meant ‘contemplating,’ looking upon something from the outside, from a position implying a view that is hidden from those who take part in the spectacle and actualize it.