Tags: Essay On Utility Of Mobile PhonesEssay On Why I Want To Study In The UkProbability Homework HelpOnline English Essay CorrectorEssays On Heidegger And Others Philosophical PapersPsychology Masters Program Personal StatementHow To Choose Dissertation TopicCreative Writing Teaching ResourcesHoliday Homework
Many contemporary philosophers agree with Kant’s argument, but many others do not.Furthermore, contemporary logicians have developed versions of the ontological argument that can even dispense with the controversial notion of existence as a property.
The next set of premises, six through twelve, work to prove that God exists in reality through a method known as “reductio ad absurdum“.
Ontological Argument Most people have not witnessed or experienced God and therefore are confused about its existence.
His understanding of God’s existence is no less clear and distinct than his proofs for the existence of any shape or number.
Therefore he adds, "although all that I concluded in the preceding Meditations were found to be false, the existence of God would pass with me as at least as certain as I have ever held the truths of mathematics." (Pg. Initially, this might not be all clear, and may have some appearance of being a sophism.
In short, God is the greatest being and none greater is possible.
These characteristics have left people to have faith in the existence of God.So the significance of the proof is ambiguous; as a logical exercise it is brilliant, as an expression of faith it may be edifying, but as an actual proof that God exists or as a means of converting atheists it seems to have no power at all. I agree with Anselm's argument that in order for God to be the Supreme Being, the best, He must exist in both the understanding as well as in reality. The only possible answer to this starting point is God. From our experience we know that everything arises from something else, and therefore God started everything.The ontological argument does not clearly prove where God is to show how God started. Traditional theology has believed that God is omnipotent (all-powerful), omniscient (all knowing), and omnibenevolent (all good), Omni-present (everywhere), eternal (with no beginning and no end), etc.His argument is also based on the premise that "the idea of an eternal being who either does not yet exist or no longer exists is self-contradictory, so that the very idea we have of such a being requires existence." (Pg. In his Meditations, Decartes offers the following version of the ontological argument.He considers the idea of God, a supremely perfect being, just as real as the idea of the existence of any shape or a number.It is clear that, considered simply as a logical argument, the ontological argument does not have the power to convert nonbelievers into believers.Or if you are a believer, it is clear that an objection to the "proof" is not going to shake your faith in any way whatsoever. If we believe that one thing came after another then there has to be a starting point."Being is evidently not a real predicate, or a concept of something that can be added to the concept of a thing.It is merely the admission of a thing, and of certain determinations in it." (Pg. His argument is that it is all right to say that God has certain characteristics but it is another to say that such a God exists.He adds that any person who hears this statement describing God understands what is meant.His argument is that if God did not exist, then a being greater than God would be possible.