Tags: Term Paper MillRhetorical Analysis Essay Papers500 700 Word EssayBest College Essay Writing ServiceCollected Essay Liturgy Modern Reform RiteResearch Paper And Documented Essay
Moreover, “It wasn’t Mnuchin’s bank that brought the suit.” , and many others.On the day of Trump’s inauguration, CNN claimed Nancy Sinatra was “not happy” with the fact that the president and first lady’s inaugural dance would be to the tune of Frank Sinatra’s “My Way.” The problem? CNN later updated the article without explaining the mistake they had made.This is how fake news works: the fake story always goes viral, while nobody reads or even hears about the correction. Steven Rattner shared it on Twitter (1,300 retweets), as did NBC News’s Brad Jaffy (1,200 retweets), the AP’s David Beard (1,900 retweets) and many others. The central scandalous claims of Woellert’s article were simply untrue.
Also on the day of the inauguration, website whose headline claimed that the Trump administration had “purged” any “climate change references” from the White House website.
Within the article, Davenport acknowledged that the “purge” (or what she also called “online deletions”) was “not unexpected” but rather part of a routine turnover of digital authority between administrations.
It has become a regular part of our news cycle, not distinct from or extraneous to it but a of it, embedded within the news apparatus as a spoke is embedded in a bicycle wheel.
Whenever you turn on a news station, visit a news website, or check in on a journalist or media personality on Twitter or Facebook, there is an excellent chance you will be exposed to fake news. It is worth cataloging at least a small sampling of the hysteria so far.
He later posted a tweet explaining why he deleted his original viral tweet; his explanatory tweet was shared a total of seven times.
Meanwhile, Pink News writer Dominic Preston wrote a report on the rumors, which garnered more than 12,000 shares on Facebook.
It was shared more than 145,000 times Eric Geller shared the story on Twitter as well. Dustin Volz from Reuters shared the link; he was retweeted nearly 2,000 times.
MSNBC’s Joy Reid shared the story and was retweeted more than 4,000 times.
At Five Thirty Eight, Nate Silver explained that it was “demographics, not hacking” that explained the curious voting numbers.
“Anyone making allegations of a possible massive electoral hack should provide proof,” he wrote, “and we can’t find any.” Additionally, Silver pointed out that the article had misrepresented the argument of one of the computer scientists in question.